i’m looking at the p2tr examples in the bitcoinjs-lib repo and many of them are structuring the script trees in what seemingly seems arbitrary. check out the example below taken from this file on line 248:
const scriptTree: Taptree = [
[
{
output: bitcoin.script.fromASM(
'50929b74c1a04954b78b4b6035e97a5e078a5a0f28ec96d547bfee9ace803ac0 OP_CHECKSIG',
),
},
[
{
output: bitcoin.script.fromASM(
'50929b74c1a04954b78b4b6035e97a5e078a5a0f28ec96d547bfee9ace803ac1 OP_CHECKSIG',
),
},
{
output: bitcoin.script.fromASM(
'2258b1c3160be0864a541854eec9164a572f094f7562628281a8073bb89173a7 OP_CHECKSIG',
),
},
],
],
[
{
output: bitcoin.script.fromASM(
'50929b74c1a04954b78b4b6035e97a5e078a5a0f28ec96d547bfee9ace803ac2 OP_CHECKSIG',
),
},
[
{
output: bitcoin.script.fromASM(
'50929b74c1a04954b78b4b6035e97a5e078a5a0f28ec96d547bfee9ace803ac3 OP_CHECKSIG',
),
},
[
{
output: bitcoin.script.fromASM(
'50929b74c1a04954b78b4b6035e97a5e078a5a0f28ec96d547bfee9ace803ac4 OP_CHECKSIG',
),
},
{
output: leafScript,
},
],
],
],
];
like how do i make sense of this?
