Let’s assume user A committed an inscription with {"op":"deploy", "tick": "test"} at block 100 (without revealing it yet). Then user B commits and reveals the exact same inscription at block 101. Because the indexer isn’t aware that A’s earlier commit was actually for "test," it recognizes B’s "test" token as the official one.
From blocks 101 to 199, users freely perform various "test" token transactions (e.g., "mint", "transfer"). However, at block 200, user A finally reveals their earlier commit. In that case, will the indexer roll back all "test"-related histories that happened between blocks 101 and 199?
If so, can we really trust that all BRC20 tokens recognized by the indexer are "safely" the official ones?
