All pro/contra bitcoin-politics aside, what’s the reason that the anti-spam fraction is so scared of CSAM in OP_RETURN, while CSAM on inscription is already possible and way cheaper? Why should CSAM have bad legal consequences, if stored in OP_RETURN, but not in inscriptions?
As a node runner, you cannot ignore OP_RETURN and you will have CSAM on your node. But the same counts for inscriptions, no? You can’t just ignore inscription data afaik.
Bitcoin exchange-traded funds have continued their winning streak, attracting billions of dollars in new investment over the past week. U.S....
Key TakeawaysPrediction market bets are more cautious than Wall Street analysts.Bitcoin’s price has a 69% chance of trading at $85,000...
In Bitcoin ETF news today, Thailand’s SEC has opened a public consultation on draft rules that would allow asset managers...
Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure Chainlink has announced 12 new integrations across...
CleanCore has disclosed plans to liquidate its Dogecoin treasury holdings as part of a broader $100 million funding plan tied...
We bring you the latest in Crypto News
