All pro/contra bitcoin-politics aside, what’s the reason that the anti-spam fraction is so scared of illicit content in OP_RETURN, while illicit content on inscription is already possible and way cheaper? Why should illicit content have bad legal consequences, if stored in OP_RETURN, but not in inscriptions?
As a node runner, you cannot ignore OP_RETURN and you will have illicit content on your node. But the same counts for inscriptions, no? You can’t just ignore inscription data afaik.
As the crypto markets rebounded on Wednesday, Bitcoin (BTC) bounced back from the recent selloff triggered by the escalating Middle...
Digital asset infrastructure firm Zero Hash has applied for a national trust bank charter with the Office of the Comptroller...
Hyperdrive launches a new leverage markets protocol to end decentralized finance “death spirals.” By using redemption-based pricing instead of volatile...
I have recently purchased 2 Gridseed G-Blade Miners, not realising the power supplies didn't come with them. Do I need...
Why is crypto up? When the headlines broke on Saturday about escalating conflict in the Middle East, the immediate reaction...
We bring you the latest in Crypto News
