All pro/contra bitcoin-politics aside, what’s the reason that the anti-spam fraction is so scared of illicit content in OP_RETURN, while illicit content on inscription is already possible and way cheaper? Why should illicit content have bad legal consequences, if stored in OP_RETURN, but not in inscriptions?
As a node runner, you cannot ignore OP_RETURN and you will have illicit content on your node. But the same counts for inscriptions, no? You can’t just ignore inscription data afaik.
In Ethereum news today, the Glamsterdam upgrade has raised Sepolia’s tested block-gas limit from about 60 million to nearly 200...
Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure TL;DR: Binance has launched a P2P merchant...
Reason to trust Strict editorial policy that focuses on accuracy, relevance, and impartiality Created by industry experts and meticulously reviewed...
Greece is planning a law to tax crypto investors’ capital gains at a rate of 15%, according to reports. According...
Key TakeawaysRep. Hill is pushing for lame-duck CLARITY Act passage to secure US dominance in digital assets.Hill argued that SEC...
We bring you the latest in Crypto News
