Policy:
or(pk(OWNER),and(older(52560),thresh(3,pk(H1),pk(H2),pk(H3),pk(H4),pk(H5))))The owner spends at any time. After about a year without moving, 3 of 5 heirs can spend.
- Is a relative timelock (
older) better than an absolute one (after) here?- Under Taproot, is
threshwithpkormulti_athe better choice for the heir branch?Tested on signet only. This is for BTCGuardiansHQ, an open-source, non-custodial inheritance prototype. Volunteer review is welcome: https://github.com/Ashworth78/btcguardianshq/issues/3









